But the general direction is clear: the Judge wants to move the claim process forward as fast as possible. We have presented the Judge with many options on ways to quickly move the relief process forward, and we continue to do everything we can to help get relief into your hands. This can be done by going to the website, www.eeoc-nrpphase2.com, or by calling 877-465-4142. The plaintiffs allege that the USPS failed to provide reasonable accommodations for these workers. The EEOC Judge now has submissions from both sides regarding relief for all Claimants. Let us help you to fight for your rights. We continue to take every action we can to ensure that this process moves forward as quickly as possible. For those clients who have not provided us with an email address, we are sending the forms via first-class mail, with a postage-paid return envelope. Second, the Administrative Judge noted that review of claims has begun, and that she hopes to begin, if possible, issuing orders and decisions on claims in the coming months! In particular, the Postal Service wanted to encourage claimants to request Final Agency Decisions (or FAD) in order to drop out of this case and start over. If you have questions that are not answered on the instructions or on this website, please call 585-272-0540. This is just an example; witnesses should include an accurate description of the changes in you that they noticed. The EEOC Administrative Judge issued a new order regarding the processing of claims in this case. The EEOC Administrative Judge has scheduled a video Status Conference for the attorneys and representatives on March 4, 2022. 10. Our law firms will compile that information and evidence along with other evidence that we already have in our possession, and submit a legal brief in support of your claim by the deadline ultimately set by the Administrative Judge. Because the enormous volume of individual claims is unprecedented at the EEOC, no one is completely certain about the precise path that the litigation will take. The Judge answered this question explicitly, and the answer is No. The Judge noted that there are two ways this case will be resolved: (1) either through the special master process; OR (2) if a claimant opts out and seeks a FAD. We understand that there is some confusion as to the date when the spreadsheet submissions are due. Therefore, if you have not already provided us with a Disability Form (Supplemental Declaration Regarding Disability), you must provide that form to us right away so that it can be filed by March 31. Thanks as always for your ongoing patience, and your assistance in this case. The name of the case is McConnell v. U.S. The Judge partially granted our motion. Significantly, the EEOC Administrative Judge made clear that only Thomas & Solomon LLP and Kator, Parks, Weiser & Harris PLLC, along with the Agency, will be working directly with the Judge both during the call itself and as we move forward with this process. The Administrative Judge has asked our offices to provide any evidence that claims were timely. If you have any additional documents, please make sure to include them with the completed Declaration. We greatly appreciate your patience during this process. To see the Motion that was filed, CLICK HERE. Please note that the answers to many questions can be found on this website (see below), or in the instructions letter that accompanied the Declaration form, or in the informational videos prepared by our firms (with links below). Thomas & Friends Trackmaster JAMES MOTORIZED Train Tank Engine 2009 WORKS! An update will be provided following the May 12, 2022 status conference. If you did either of those two things, then there is no need to fill out another retainer agreement. Similarly, the Administrative Judge has indicated that she is working remotely on this case (and others). We hope that this will assist the Administrative Judge in getting all the claims in this case reviewed and decided in an efficient manner. If you have not yet received the notice from the EEOC, please continue to be patient for a fewmore days. Over the next few weeks, we will be sending out new forms to many of our clients to complete. The United States Postal Service (USPS) has fired or forced out nearly 44,000 employees who were injured on the job since 2006 through its National Reassessment Process (NRP), according to a. Your claim in this case is a personal asset. We had asked that the Judge order USPS to provide the NRP Activity Files for every Claimant directly to the Judge and the Claimants themselves. Legal Case Summary. Since the Agency has produced their portion of the spreadsheet, our attorneys have not only been working on their portions of the spreadsheet, but have also begun raising concerns with the Agency as to deficiencies in their portion of the spreadsheet. As soon as the Judge issues a written ruling on our motion for extension of time, we will post updated information on this website. We understand that some class members who submitted claims for individual relief have received response letters from the Postal Service. Yes, if you retain us, you will owe a 30% contingency fee on the value of your recovery. This is a big victory for all claimants, and a giant step toward conclusion of this process. See below for more information.
Nrpclassaction.com: Home | NRP Class Action If you receive a request from us for additional information, we urge you to respond as soon as possible. We will fight the USPS attempt to break apart the certified class and extinguish claims for relief one by one. You may also be able to obtain relief for harm from harassment you experienced as a consequence of the NRP. Yes. The EEOC Judge, on the other hand, has clearly demonstrated a desire to move forward as efficiently as possible. As noted in our February 2021 update, the Judge recently issued an Order setting out a process for reviewing claims in this case. Accordingly, it is a good idea to proceed cautiously. We have notched many milestone successes in this case since 2006. For those Class Members who have designated Class Counsel as their representatives during the relief process, we will be sending you a form to be completed and returned to be used to support your claim. At Thomas & Solomon LLP, we forcefully protect those rights. She said that not all claims will receive a hearing, but that the EEOC would choose certain claims to be heard by EEOC Administrative Judges. Meaning, the Agency has identified certain individuals they believe did not submit a timely claim to NEEOSIO. However, even if you previously sent documents and information to us, you MUST complete and sign the Declaration form and return it to us no later than March 25, 2019. As 2022 nears its conclusion, we note that all of us had hoped for more progress in this case. So I understood that I had no option but to retire; or Nevertheless, those survey responses might help give you a starting point! If we receive your completed Declaration form by April 1, 2019, we will be able to satisfy the deadlines in this case. Employee Rights Class-Action Law Firm Employers who violate employment laws hope that their workers do not contact Thomas & Solomon LLP. Our proposed Case Management Order is carefully tailored to this unprecedented case. To the best of our knowledge, the EEOC has never created a website devoted to a single case.
NRP Class Action Against USPS - THE NEWS JUNKIE DAILY - Facebook Thank you for your cooperation and patience through this lengthy process. Please note: the Judge emphasized that the EEOC wants to have the most current contact information for each claimant. The legal term for this situation is constructive discharge. Section 7 of the Declaration form will help you figure out if your situation is covered by constructive discharge. Here are three suggestions in connection with constructive discharge claims.First, you should read over all of the statements in Section 7 of the Declaration form, to see which statements apply to you. Again, do the best you can with the information you know. The USPS attorneys sought to use its repeated appeals as a way to stall the case further and challenge the Administrative Judges authority. That means that your claim will have to be processed and reviewed by the EEOC Administrative Judge before the Postal Service will be required to issue a Final Decision. If you did not receive an automated call from us with the special number for you to call to hear the recording, please reach out via email at nrpclassaction@theemploymentattorneys.com or by telephone at 585-272-0540. A lengthy status conference was held with the Administrative Judge on May 13, 2019. We will continue to provide updates on this website as notable developments occur. We will not submit claim packages for claimants who have not retained our firms to represent them in the claims process. The EEOC Decision in this case recognizes that many class members had no option other than retirement, separation, or resignation as a result of the NRP. In 2006, Sandra McConnell was reviewed under the NRP in the USPS Western New York District. However, settlement is not possible in every case. My Supervisors or co-workers called me lazy due to my restrictions. Again, if you have not yet provided us with a Disability Form (Supplemental Declaration Regarding Disability), you must provide that form to us right away so that it can be filed with the Judge by March 31. The Declaration packet we mailed to you includes a sample Witness Statement form that can be used for this purpose. Our law offices have also been impacted by the Covid-19 situation. The Judge has not yet made clear exactly how she plans to move forward with reviewing the information or issuing relief decisions. Our submission may be viewed here. If applicable to you, here are some possible short statements that can help explain what happened: As always, we greatly appreciate your support and patience throughout this process. We will work to ensure that the EEOC again swiftly rejects the improper appeal, and work to have the EEOC Administrative Judge press forward with an efficient review process without delay. We are hopeful that these additional resources will assist the Administrative Judge in the evaluation of the more than 28,000 claims that were filed. It depends. Thank you for all of your continued patience with this case, and we hope to have more progress to report to everyone soon. It may take a few days for us to work through this large volume of inquiries, but we are dedicated to handling every question from our clients in a timely manner. Find many great new & used options and get the best deals for Trackmaster Thomas & Friends Train Tank Engine - Red Passenger Coach - Hit Toy at the best online prices at eBay! Please note: if you previously sent supporting documents to us, you do not need to re-send those documents to us. The Judge reiterated that Special Masters will be used to speed up the claim review process, and the Judge rejected all USPS objections to the use of Special Masters. If you are a person who is hard of hearing or deaf, and you need an alternative method of receiving the information, please reach out to our office directly via email at nrpclassaction@theemploymentattorneys.com or by telephone at 585-272-0540. With the recent dismissals of the USPS final action and appeals of the Administrative Judges orders, we are hopeful that the Special Masters will be selected soon and the claims review process will commence in the very near future. 7. If you would like to retain our firms at this time to represent you in your individual claim, please let us know immediately, and we will send you a retainer letter that must be signed by you and returned to our office. This website is intended for the sole use of claimants and their attorneys/representatives in the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission class action involving the NRP and allegations of discrimination (Velva B, et al. A class action complaint for injured on duty postal employees was certified by an EEOC Administrative Judge (AJ) on May 30,2008. My co-workers made fun of me, and told me that I would end up being sent to work for Walmart. NRP Class Action Lawsuit Update - December, 2020 Posted on December 14, 2020 Status Update We wanted to reach out and give a quick update on the case, and answer some questions that have been raised. No new date has been scheduled, but please continue to check the website for updates. It has come to our attention that a number of people who were Class Members in the Pittman v. USPS class action have been receiving letters from USPS about that settlement process. 9. If you have any questions about the forms when you receive them, please contact us at 585-272-0540.